| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Aerotel v Telco and Macrossan's Application ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd
Aerotel v Telco and Macrossan's Application is a judgment by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. The judgment was passed down on 27 October 2006 and relates to two different appeals from decisions of the High Court. The first case involved 〔Note: This link goes to the published patent ''application'', not the granted patent.〕 granted to Aerotel Ltd and their infringement action against Telco Holdings Ltd and others. The second case concerned filed by Neal Macrossan but refused by the UK Patent Office (now operating as the UK Intellectual Property Office).
The reasoning in the judgment forms the basis for the current practice of the UK Intellectual Property Office, when assessing whether patent applications are for patentable subject matter.
The approach applied in the judgment has been criticized by a Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) as being "irreconcilable with the European Patent Convention".〔 (Decision T 154/04 ) of November 15, 2006, Reasons 13, to be published at the Official Journal of the European Patent Office.〕
==History==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|